1l_kite.gif (9095 bytes)Team Analysis1l_kite.gif (9095 bytes)

Back Home Next

Group Habits

 Forming

The initial forming of the group was via e-mail introductions. Members sent out e-mails to each other with brief introductions, which included occupation and family status. The first two meetings of the group tentative and extremely task oriented around completing the Turnaround projects. At this point in the group development, it was still unsure as to what roles each would play in the group. The first meeting to work on Turnaround was difficult—answers were chosen based on majority rules leaving some members feeling as if they had been "outvoted."

Storming

The moment of truth for Group 1- Groton was the Energy International exercise. We did not work well as a team on this exercise. We didn’t approach the task in an organized and cohesive manner. Seeking and giving of information was tentative, resulting in the wrong conclusion. We all knew that we had to work on our group building skills. We had approached the assignment in a disorganized manner. Sharing of information was key to this project and the group did not accomplish this.

There was also some internal conflict as to times and locations of the meetings.

Meetings had to be changed to accommodate individual schedules—generally went fine but occasionally raised some conflict.

Norming

By the fourth meeting it was easy to observe the group building and maintenance roles in progress. There was a great deal of emphasis on coordinating as well as supporting. The tenor of the email communication has changed—it is friendly, joking and down to business but in a supportive and open manner. The group is able to add fun and humor to the tasks at hand.

One of the greatest difficulties faced by the members of this group was the allocation of time. Most members were taking at least one other course simultaneously and trying desperately to find a balance between work, school, and family. We decided as a group that meeting on Sundays would be the most convenient for all. The group was flexible—and ready to change times and locations to ensure that all group members are present.

During this stage of Group 1’s development there is a mediating and harmonious overtone to the meetings. Members are starting to feel comfortable with each other.

Performing

After a few false starts, the group has agreed on a project. All were excited about the Kite Building/Flying project. The group extensively shared decision making as to the actual make and model of the kite. We looked forward to the actual date of implementation. In the beginning of our group formation, our idea of a project would be one that was extremely structured and functional. As the group got more comfortable with each other it was much easier to conceive of doing project that would be structured by the group members and not an external influence. The group was comfortable with problem solving.

Lifo Influences

Our team was a nice mix of Controlling/Taking, Adapting/Dealing and Conserving/Holding. When we first came together to do the first turnaround project we were unaware of our differing personality styles. Some members were more apt to lead the group and others followed. When we completed the LIFO personality testing and compared scores it all made sense! We were able to understand our various orientations and appreciate them. It made our roles so much clearer. Understanding LIFO brings about a tolerance and understanding that enables the group to come together and work on a project and capitalize on each other’s strengths.

Back to Top
For problems or questions regarding this web contact The Soaring Seven.
Last updated: April 16, 2000.